illusions

as the waves swoshed up the breakwaters, the reflection of light, thanks to the explanation of science, leads us away from delusion. the floating rock, or so the eye believes, is not what we should believe. similar to tainted glasses, skeptism overwhelms me again. however, the company i got was tremendous, only if the thoughts in my compatriot's mind were pleasant. pardon me, i just hope nature was to your liking and was trying to divert the negative mindset of a hectic life. wash away the miserable emotions with the waters of the world, if not embrace it. also, i wish for your trust and thus, the comfort of presence and sharing.

and the magpies swerved in a circular motion above the heads, freedom was my immediate link. it is our choice to sit there and integrate into mother Earth, as the skies proved to be distinct and forthright. we are free to believe in anything, as it is our imagination -- our right. something that is solely ours, but doubts might pour in saying that we are being controlled. sure, people can believe in their religion, i respect them; it is the concept of freedom of belief in which is my main concern here.

my dear classmates have shared their piece with me, and i totally agree. i am free to accept that certain proclaimed "wrong mindsets" are people's choice, and how sure are we to ascertain that it is indeed right or wrong? are you then saying that we KNOW what is right or wrong? why then are you still a pathetic human being? does the majority say it IS wrong, thus it must be so? oh well, such is the rudiments of 'concepts', if that's what you're wondering why i am focusing so much on it. the idea is the allow the human race to 'understand' each other ideas and thus, concepts. if you have no idea what i'm saying, here's an example to clarify. an easy to grasp case is the one on euthanasia, where sides are normally distributed for and against the stand. as bystanders, yes, we can simply say, "go ahead, end his suffering" such language few yet impactfully disgusting. is that then the so called natural right? or advocates of the opposition would protest, "we are not the person himself, how do we know whether the person has a strong will to live on?" equally disgusting, if you ask me. people have the concepts at their fingertips as to fish twirling a ball at theirs. basics... ...

next, then, is about being unique. people are entitled to a smogasboard of perceptions, so do we classify the so called 'odd one out' (ie. different) as weird? i would comment that we are all but disillusioned. yes, there are people who are intellectually soaring, fashionably revealing or verbosely vindicating. SO? oh well, keep to the meagre viewpoints that one might freely possess as i continue to explore the wonders of the world. rock on!~ =)

i just love the way you sat there with me silently, if we were to indulge in the scenery with your soft tinted streaks against the width, that would be wonderful. =D your mind is full of wonderful thoughts which i await to pry on. heh